Common pitfalls of "Talk to your data"

Many clients are experimenting and requesting AI agents that query their databases. "Just ask questions in plain English and get instant insights!", sounds simple enough.

SQL is language and LLMs speak if fluently. However, the truth is making agents reliably talk to your production data is far more complex than the demos suggest.

The Three Hidden Challenges

Simply put, here are three fundamental issues that make "talk to your data" much harder than it appears. Especially when you're dealing with real business systems, not demo databases.

1. The Performance Trap: One Query, Many Paths

Here's how database queries work in practical terms: there's usually more than one way to get the same answer. In a small demo database, who cares? But in your production environment with millions of records, one approach returns results in milliseconds while another locks up your system for minutes.

When you unleash an autonomous AI agent on your database, you're essentially rolling the dice. Will it choose the efficient path with proper indexing? Or will it construct a query that sends your database administrator into panic mode?

For example, imagine querying customer orders from the last month. The agent could:

• Use the indexed date field (fast)
• Scan every single order and filter by date (disaster)
• Join multiple tables unnecessarily (somewhere in between)

Without careful engineering, you have no guarantee which approach your agent will take – today, tomorrow, or when the CEO is waiting for that critical report.

2. The Variance Problem: When Consistency Matters

Let's be honest about how businesses actually use data. You're not asking unique, creative questions every day. Most data queries are repetitive – and that's by design.

Think about your typical reporting workflow:

• 3-5 core tables you query regularly
• 3-5 standard queries for each table
• These 9-25 queries probably cover 90% of your daily needs

Why does this matter? Because these queries feed into dashboards, reports, and downstream processes. Your finance team needs the monthly revenue calculated the same way every time. Your inventory system depends on consistent stock counts. You probably have a definition of a "active account" or "paying user" that needs to be calulated the same way every time.

But AI agents thrive on creativity. Ask "show me last month's sales" twice, and you might get two different interpretations. Was that calendar month or last 30 days? Gross or net? Including pending transactions or only completed? By category or total?

What seems like helpful flexibility becomes a liability when you need reliable, reproducible results.

3. The Translation Challenge: Your Database Speaks Its Own Language

This is the killer: the more complex and specialized your database, the worse AI agents perform on it.

Generic LLMs are trained on publicly available patterns. They understand common database structures and standard business terms. But your production database? It's full of company-specific logic that would baffle any outsider.

What does an AI agent do when:

• The field "STAT_CD" having 'K' as the second character means an order has shipped?
• "Customer Type 3" actually means enterprise clients (for historical reasons nobody remembers)?
• The "deleted" flag being 0 means active, but only in certain tables?

Your database is essentially speaking a dialect that evolved over years of business decisions, quick fixes, and "we'll document it later" moments. An LLM trained on generic data has zero chance of understanding these nuances without extensive preparation.

The Reality: Your data investments pay out

Here's what this means for your business: implementing "talk to your data" isn't just dropping in an AI agent and calling it done.

You still need:

Performance optimization – Guiding agents toward efficient query patterns
Template engineering – Creating reliable patterns for your common queries
Semantic mapping – Teaching the AI your specific business logic and terminology, with data catalogs and other best practice patterns
Validation layers – Ensuring consistency in critical reporting scenarios

The promise of natural language data access is real, but the path requires the same thoughtful data engineering we've always needed, now combined with agentic AI expertise.

Making It Work in Practice

Companies need to approach this challenge with eyes wide open. The winners aren't trying to skip on the data work overnight. They're strategically deploying AI agents where they add value while maintaining control where consistency matters. They are building the necessary data layers, handbooks and dictionaries for the agents to utilize the data. You don't want to build black boxes or externalize your ontologies.

The Path Forward

The direction is clear: AI agents will revolutionize how we interact with data. But the journey requires more than just plugging in an LLM and hoping for the best.

Success comes from recognizing that your production data environment is complex, specialized, and mission-critical. It demands the same rigor in implementation that you'd apply to any core business system, plus new expertise in making AI agents work reliably within those constraints.

Ready to implement AI agents that actually understand your data? We've learned these lessons the hard way, so you don't have to. Contact us to discuss how to make natural language data access work in your real production environment.

---
Jonas Pomoell is the founder and lead AI business consultant at Des Train AI Oy, specializing in deploying transformative generative AI solutions. With deep expertise in AI-driven business automation and data systems, Jonas helps companies navigate the complexities of implementing AI agents in production environments.